Planning Ontology Foundation
Initial ontology schema for planning domains, planners, tasks, and performance properties.
Ontology-driven representations for planning knowledge and explainability, spanning PO, maPO, and OMEGA for queryable, reusable, and human-readable planner behavior.
This research line builds ontological infrastructure for automated planning and explainability. It starts with a general planning ontology (PO) for planner behavior, expands into multi-agent execution semantics (maPO), and culminates in OMEGA, an explainability pipeline that converts raw MAPF traces into human-readable causal narratives.
The unifying goal is to make planning artifacts queryable and reusable: selecting planners from historical signals, extracting reusable macro patterns, and explaining behavior in robot-deployment settings where standard solver logs are hard to interpret.
Initial ontology schema for planning domains, planners, tasks, and performance properties.
Extended ontology coverage and evidence on planner selection and planning knowledge reuse.
Ontology extension for collision events, replanning causes, and multi-agent execution semantics.
Operational system that maps MAPF execution logs to contextual, user-facing explanations.
PROV-O provenance into a SPARQL-queryable knowledge graph.
Historical IPC traces become structured evidence for selecting planners that best match domain and instance characteristics before execution.
Provenance-rich action traces support mining reusable macro operators that reduce search burden in related planning tasks.
A Planning.Domains plugin converts PDDL artifacts to RDF, enabling direct ontology-backed analysis in existing planning workflows.
Key entities include ma:Agent, ma:CollisionEvent, ma:ConflictAlert, and ma:ReplanningStrategy, connected through provenance links that preserve event causality.
OMEGA Framework: execution traces are transformed to RDF graphs over maPO, queried through SPARQL templates, and rendered as contextual explanations aligned with animation states. In user studies, participants preferred OMEGA explanations over raw logs (95.2% preference; 4.40/5 clarity).
The demo emphasizes practical explainability during MAPF execution, showing why collisions occur, how conflict alerts are triggered, and which replanning strategy resolves each issue.
The publications below trace the progression from planning ontology foundations to MAPF-specific explanation tooling. Each milestone adds a more concrete execution or explanation layer on top of the same semantic base.